🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

A letter obtained by media originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a pending law that include lowering the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in circulation among civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid wider concerns about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the cigarette manufacturers was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of business advocacy worldwide. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the bill passes.

International experts actually suggests a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the removal of broad restrictions on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for different infractions “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the managing director of the African subsidiary states the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We exist in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and harvest that and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator stated: “The company operates its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, noting that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.