🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complicated, It's Costly

According to recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to political disagreements regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. The existing system doesn't change. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning average wages pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. The company pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average American pays. I know multiple businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding about benefits by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation could be that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.